NYC congestion tolling unleashes congestion nightmare
Congestion toll chaos will push commuters to ditch their cars
Costly and Glitchy: A Taxpayer-Funded Electric Vehicle Odyssey
Biden administration official set out to make a point through her own long road trip
Mileage tax means tracking your every move, using carbon footprint against you
How a mileage tax in the Biden federal highway bill could mean tracking your every move, not to mention the equivalent of a toll for every mile you drive.
The Battle to Kill the Kill Switch
What can we do to protect Texas from the radical Left’s overreach that will shut off our ability to drive?

RPT Legislative Priorities

  • By Terri Hall
    Founder/Executive Director
    Texans Uniting for Reform & Freedom (TURF) &
    Texans for Toll-free Highways


    AV Taxi

    BRAVE NEW WORLD

    One of the most stealth transportation bills of the session was related to the regulation (or lack of it) of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs), SB 2425 by Nichols. This particular bill was to authorize level 4 and 5 AVs to operate on Texas roadways without any requirement of a human driver. While we brought up several serious concerns, like a hostile actor or government gaining control of a fleet of AVs and using them for a mass casualty event, in both the Senate and House Committees, the AV bill was attached as an amendment by Capriglione to a totally different bill, SB 2807 by Senator Brent Hagenbuch, without any debate. If our guys were paying close enough attention, they could have easily called a point of order because the AV amendment was not relevant to the bill (completely unrelated or not ‘germane’ to the primary bill, which isn’t allowed under the rules), but it was hastily passed before anyone had a chance to amend it. 

    At least two amendments would have been debated had the AV bill gone through the usual floor debate prior to the vote. One would have been to require a human driver (from Rep. Christina Morales who had a stand alone bill to do that), and the other by Rep. Andy Hopper (who also had a stand alone bill) to clarify liability when there’s no human driver actually operating the vehicle. Currently, there are no AVs that operate without human drivers outside of commercial trucks and robotaxi services like WayMo, Cruise, and soon to be Tesla. So while consumers may not have to face it yet, they should be aware of the tremendous legal risk of owning or renting out any sort of AV as a taxi service since the current law places liability on the owner, not the AI technology actually responsible for operating the vehicle. In the event regular consumers can purchase their own level 4 or 5 AV for their personal use, buyer beware — you’re liable when the technology fails and causes crashes or fatalities.  

    The only real regulation put on these driverless AVs was a permitting process, establishing a system for how AVs must interact with law enforcement and EMS, and the requirement to carry a certain level of insurance. Lawmakers deliberately did not tackle liability issues and fully admit lawsuits will fly when accidents happen. The bill even bars local governments from enacting any further regulations. In speaking with a reporter about the bill, she said the approach to regulating these AVs was like building a plane while it’s already in the air. She couldn’t be more right!

    Almost as scary, was House passage of the Digital ID bill, HB 3426 also by Capriglione. Digital IDs on a person's Smart phone can be hacked, used to steal Texans' identities, and misused by bad actors. Digital IDs are also opposed in the RPT platform Plank #49. Many conservatives voted for it, falling for the argument it’s ‘voluntary’ not mandatory. However, 9 states have already turned their ‘voluntary’ digital ID programs into mandatory ones in AZ, CA, CO, GA, HI, IA, MD, NM, and OH. 

    How would the state not incur virtually unlimited costs for cybersecurity firms to secure this data and keep hackers at bay? Is this not an ongoing expense that cannot possibly be covered in whatever nominal fee DPS charges for the digital IDs? Yet the bill had no fiscal note. We don’t have an honest analysis of these bills by the Legislative Budget Board if they can claim a digital ID program comes with no cost to the state to implement and maintain it! It passed the House 119-30, but thankfully went nowhere in the Senate.

    Most Texans don’t share the love affair with bikes

    Every session, TURF fends off the relentless onslaught of anti-car legislation aiming to restrict cars by slowing speeds, forcing you to vacate a lane to pass a bike, or otherwise give deference to bikes, buses and pedestrians. In a last gasp House Transportation Committee hearing very late in the session, a series of Leftist, anti-car bills were pushed by radical climate alarmist groups like Vision Zero, Farm & City, and Safe Streets Austin to restrict your mobility. But thanks to the hard work of TURF and its grassroots coalition, none passed. However, an early one that made it through was SB 305 by Senator Charles Perry to expand the move over laws to force you to vacate a lane for animal control and parking enforcement vehicles on the shoulder of a road, these are in addition to the other vehicles already in statute like EMS, police, and tow trucks. The list grows every session.  

    Freedom recedes as government grows

    Even the tax on roadside lemonade stands (repealed in 2019) was resurrected and passed this session, in HB 2012 by Cecil Bell. The legislature just gave Texans the freedom from government interference with things like a kids' lemonade stand to earn some money and learn entrepreneurship, yet only a few years later, they flip flopped and imposed the tax once again (brought to you by the taxpayer-funded lobbyists at the Texas Association of Counties).  We're choking under regulation! 

    The long, incremental march to increase your taxes and erode your freedom to travel is alive and well, and it’s often being perpetrated by big government Republicans, not Democrats. There are literally dozens more bad bills that passed one chamber or both this session, but it’s time to turn off the firehose. You get the idea. Calling the session a 'mixed bag’ is being generous. TURF will release its Report Card later this summer, with each lawmaker’s grade based on every record vote related to every transportation bill we weighed in on, and EVERY legislator was given fair notice of our support or opposition prior to each vote. So let the accountability begin!


    89th Session Wrap-Up:

  • By Terri Hall
    Founder/Executive Director
    Texans Uniting for Reform & Freedom (TURF) &
    Texans for Toll-free Highways


    Photo by Sten Rademaker on UnsplashWhile we headed into session with the wind at our backs having achieved a call to abolish all toll roads in the Republican Party of Texas (RPT) Platform and getting three pro-driver initiatives added to the official RPT Legislative Priorities, what we got in the end was one out of those three official priorities. 

    What was it? The first ever Right to Repair billHB 2963 by Giovanni Capriglione (and SB 2428 by Senator Bob Hall in the Senate) — to become law in a red state. It’s YUGE when it comes to protecting drivers from dealer and manufacturer monopolies that force us to pay outlandish prices to repair or obtain replacement parts for our cars (which explodes the cost of car ownership). While it wasn’t our preferred bill (there was a stronger one authored by Rep. Pat Curry, HB 4555 and Senator Hall, SB 2748, that failed to get a hearing), it is a MAJOR step in the right direction and puts manufacturers on notice that the America First agenda includes making driving affordable again!

    The other two official transportation-related RPT priorities listed under Ending Federal Overreach (priority #8) were ending road diets and protecting Texas drivers from the remote kill switch mandated to go into all vehicles starting next year. The bill to end road diets, HB 4348, also authored by Capriglione and Hall in the Senate, got a last minute hearing in the House and even made it onto the final House calendar, but failed to pass in time as the clock ran out. What is a road diet? Anti-car policies being adopted in many Texas cities that remove or shrink the lanes available to cars and repurpose them as bus or bike only lanes and/or sidewalks. 

    It often also involves installing buffers like protruding curbs and sidewalks, artificially lowering speed limits and generally putting up interference for drivers that intentionally create congestion, road delay, and frustration — reducing quality of life. Meanwhile, transit ridership has fallen and failed to bounce back from pre-pandemic levels, despite all the gimmicks by cities to increase transit use. Roads diets have not pushed people out of their cars and into transit as advertised, rather, congestion and vehicle registrations have increased in Texas, while transit ridership continues to plummet. We’re nowhere near finished with this priority — Texans want congestion relief, not intentionally creating more of it with less efficient roads.

    The Biden Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) includes a mandate to install a remote kill switch in all cars after 2026. The rule published by the U.S. Department of Transportation would allow the government to passively monitor your driving at all times, including with interior cameras on the driver to monitor eye movements, lane monitoring, as well as monitoring the air inside your car, presumably to detect ‘impairment’, then cut power to your car if it thinks you’re ‘impaired’ in some way. It’s a dangerous, unconstitutional, big government surveillance state in your car. The RPT Platform Plank #49 also urges swift action by the legislature to protect Texas drivers from vehicles with remote kill switches in them.

    SB 381 by Senator Mayes Middleton and HB 2547 by Rep. Briscoe Cain would have prevented the sale of vehicles with remote kill switches in the Lone Star State. Dealers who violated the law would be subject to losing their license to sell vehicles in Texas. In a different bill by Rep. Nate Schatzline, HB 1074 dubbed the ‘Right to Drive Act,’ it included protection from vehicles with a remote kill switch, the right to own a gas-powered car, and the right to drive in a vehicle with human decision-making (vs being forced into autonomous vehicle). None of these bills even got a hearing, despite the massive party and grassroots support behind them. A separate bill by Curry, HB 2440, prohibiting government from banning vehicles based on fuel type did successfully pass. That’s welcome news for Texas drivers! Since then, President Donald Trump has successfully ended the EV mandates nationally. 


    89th Session Wrap-Up:

Upcoming TURF Events

See what is happening and how you can get involved! Attend the monthly TURF meeting...


Donate Now

Help us fight to preserve our rights and freedoms!
Make a secure donation today!
or donate by mail. We cannot do it without you!