Sidebar

Important Information

2024 General Election Voter Guide

2024 Resolutions for Party Conventions


Lege Wrap-up

2023 Session Report Card


Slides from Public Talks


Why public-private partnerships are anti-taxpayer

Texans for Reform & Freedom Texans for Reform & Freedom
  • Home
  • Press
  • Contact Us
  • About TURF
    • About Us
    • Standing Meetings
  • Grassroots Action Center
    • Session Resources
    • Toll-Free Texas: Reforms
    • Party Platform Resolutions
    • Public Hearings
    • Transportation 101
    • Social Resources
  • Donate Today!
  • Eminent Domain
  • News & Blog
    • Latest News
      • Misc. News
      • Eminent domain
      • Trans Texas Corridor
      • Public Private Partnerships
      • Regional Mobility Authority
      • Metropolitan Planning Org.
    • Press Releases
      • San Antonio
      • Texas State Wide
    • SA Toll Party blog archives
  • Resources
    • Report Cards & Voter Guides
    • Non-toll Solutions
    • Glossary of Toll Terms
    • Funny But Sad
    • Public Talks
    • Transportation 101
  • Email Updates
facebook logo Like TURF   twitter logo Follow TURF
  • Home
  • Press
  • Contact Us

Politicians penchant for selling off public assets

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Link to article here.

Our Politicians Are Selling Off Pieces Of America To Foreign Investors – And Goldman Sachs Is Helping Them Do It

End of the American Dream.com

All over the United States, politicians are selling off key pieces of infrastructure to foreign investors and big Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs are helping them do it.  State and local governments across the country that are drowning in debt and that are desperate for cash are increasingly turning to the "privatization" of public assets as the solution to their problems.  Pieces of infrastructure that taxpayers have already paid for such as highways, water treatment plants, libraries, parking meters, airports and power plants are being auctioned off to the highest bidder.  Most of the time what happens is that the state or local government receives a huge lump sum of cash up front for a long-term lease (usually 75 years or longer) and the foreign investors come in and soak as much revenue out of the piece of infrastructure that they possibly can.  The losers in these deals are almost always the taxpayers.  Pieces of America are literally being auctioned off just to help state and local governments minimize their debt problems for a year or two, but the consequences of these deals will be felt for decades.


Sadly, this trend continues to accelerate.  Just this week, a bill that will allow the state government of Ohio to proceed with plans to lease the Ohio Turnpike to investors was approved.  The state government of Ohio will soon receive a one-time injection of cash and everyone in the area that uses the Ohio Turnpike will end up paying much higher tolls for decades to come.

Highways have also been auctioned off (most of the time to foreign investors) in Indiana, the city of Chicago, Florida, Virginia and Texas.

Amazingly, many politicians continue to insist that selling off pieces of infrastructure that have already been fully paid for by taxpayers is a wonderful thing.  In fact, there are actually some politicians that have the gall to call it a "conservative" thing to do.

For example, Rick Perry has been at the forefront of the effort to "privatize" the highways of Texas.

You would think that the people of Texas would have gotten rid of him by now, but considering the fact that he may be running for the Republican nomination in 2012, he just might be our next president.

What makes the selling off of our infrastructure even worse is that big Wall Street banks such as Goldman Sachs are helping our corrupt politicians do it.

In fact, Wall Street sees a tremendous opportunity in the "distressed assets" of our broke state and local governments.

The fact that Goldman Sachs is making millions auctioning off our public infrastructure should make the blood of all red-blooded Americans boil.  The following is a brief excerpt from a recent article posted on dylanratigan.com....

On Wall Street, setting up and running “Infrastructure Funds” is big business, with over $140 billion run by such banks as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Australian infrastructure specialist Macquarie. Goldman’s 2010 SEC filing should give you some sense of the scope of the campaign. Goldman says it will be involved with “ownership and operation of public services, such as airports, toll roads and shipping ports, as well as power generation facilities, physical commodities and other commodities infrastructure components, both within and outside the United States.” While the bank sees increased opportunity in “distressed assets” (ie. Cities and states gone broke because of the financial crisis), the bank also recognizes “reputational concerns with the manner in which these assets are being operated or held.”

Why does Goldman Sachs always seem to be at the heart of so many things that are wrong with our financial system?

Unfortunately, Goldman Sachs is not the only one seeking to make a quick buck these days.

Foreign investors in particular seem to have an affinity for pieces of U.S. infrastructure, and Wall Street banks such as Goldman Sachs love to help them gobble it up.

The sovereign wealth funds of nations such as Saudi Arabia, China, Kuwait, Libya, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates are eagerly investing in highways, ports, toll roads and even parking meters all across America.

So precisely what is a sovereign wealth fund?

In a previous article I defined it as "a huge mountain of state-owned money that roams about the countryside looking for assets to gobble up."

The combination of sovereign wealth funds with huge piles of money to burn and state and local governments that are desperate to raise cash has created something of a "perfect storm".

In an article for Rolling Stone, Matt Taibbi documented some of the key pieces of infrastructure that these sovereign wealth funds have been gobbling up....

A toll highway in Indiana. The Chicago Skyway. A stretch of highway in Florida. Parking meters in Nashville, Pittsburgh, Los Angeles, and other cities. A port in Virginia. And a whole bevy of Californian public infrastructure projects, all either already leased or set to be leased for fifty or seventy-five years or more in exchange for one-off lump sum payments of a few billion bucks at best, usually just to help patch a hole or two in a single budget year.

As Taibbi noted, the money that is raised from these long-term leases usually only helps fix budget problems for a year or two, but the pieces of infrastructure that are being auctioned off will be in the hands of foreigners for decades to come.

Sadly, much of our own infrastructure is not even built in this country anymore.

For example, a 2,050 foot bridge that is going to connect San Francisco and Oakland is actually being built in China and is being shipped over to the U.S. piece by piece.

This bridge is being constructed by the China State Construction Engineering Group, and according to an article in The Telegraph, they have been building a whole lot of major projects all over the United States....

CSCEC has already built seven schools in the US, apartment blocks in Washington DC and New York and is in the middle of building a 4,000-room casino in Atlantic City. In New York, it has won contracts to renovate the subway system, build a new metro platform near Yankee stadium, and refurbish the Alexander Hamilton Bridge over the Harlem river.

Massive corporations that are either fully or partially owned by the Chinese government are deeply integrating themselves into the U.S. economy.

For much more on this phenomenon, please see a previous article I authored entitled "The Chinese Government Is Buying Up Economic Assets And Huge Tracts Of Land All Over The United States".

Sadly, as our state and local governments get even deeper into debt, the amount of infrastructure that is being auctioned off to foreigners will continue to grow.

Most Americans don't realize how desperate many state and local governments have become.  For example, things have gotten so tight that New York City is now actually rationing toilet paper at Coney Island.

The United States is drowning in debt from coast to coast and pieces of the country are literally being auctioned off.  The looting and the "privatization" are only going to intensify as our state and local government debt problems get even worse.

Perhaps on all future maps of the world we should just put a big "for sale" sign on the United States.

What in the world has happened to this country?

The War on Cars: Who’s putting us on a ‘road diet’?

Details
News
Some may have never heard the term “complete streets” or “walkable communities” so allow me to enlighten you. The “Complete Streets” policy of the San Antonio Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization says “it will serve to provide safe access for all users including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and bus riders.” Sounds harmless, right? There’s more. It also says the benefits include “encouraging walking and bicycling, eases transportation mobility, encourages children to become more physically active along with reducing air emissions from single occupancy vehicles.”

By now you may be asking how does providing safe access to roads translate into reducing single occupancy vehicles? Because the “complete streets” initiatives aren’t about adding curbs and sidewalks (which indeed are needed to accommodate pedestrians and the disabled) as much as about declaring an all-out war on cars. Like “complete streets,” “walkable communities” is code for the United Nations’ Agenda 21 initiatives that seek to abolish private property, reduce the carbon footprint of humans, restrict mobility, and basically control what we eat, how many children we can have, how we travel, and where we can live, work, and play -- initiatives which are already being implemented through ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability in over 600 cities nationwide and in 178 countries worldwide.

The MPO has adopted into its bylaws this “complete streets” policy that requires ALL future transportation improvement projects to include bicycle and pedestrian facilities. That means take already scarce highway funds and mandate part of them be spent on bike and pedestrian trails or sidewalks, etc. Few if any state highways are the appropriate place for sidewalks or pedestrians so it likely means the practical application of this is to use highway funds to build hike and bike trails elsewhere as part of every highway project. Any exceptions must be “adequately documented” and “bicycle and pedestrian components included in a project cannot be deleted from the project at a future date in accordance with this policy.”

Organizations like the National Conference of State Legislatures are promoting key Agenda 21 policies, including drafting sample legislation for your state representative to take home and enact into law. 'Complete streets' policies and public private partnerships were both on the agenda of last year's conference and Texas State Representative Linda Harper-Brown came back and introduced legislation for both initiatives this year, but her attempts to pass a state 'complete streets" policy failed largely due to the efforts of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom exposing it as an anti-car, anti-property rights Agenda 21 scheme. However, some Texas cities have already adopted a 'complete streets' policy at the local level through their MPOs, including Austin, Houston, and San Antonio.

The policy not only heists already scarce gas taxes to pay for other modes, but also grows government bureaucracy. The MPO has a full time “Bicycle/Pedestrian Planner.” The City of San Antonio has also added a full-time “Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator.” In 2009, the city hired a new Sustainable Transportation Coordinator, Julia Diana, as part of the City of San Antonio’s Office of Environmental Policy.  Diana’s background has little to do with transportation and more to do with preserving open space. She’s served on the Linear Creekway Parks Advisory Board and is a founding board member of the Voelcker Park Conservancy.

“What we need to do is make biking and walking easier.  I live in the suburbs and have access to very little infrastructure which promotes biking.  I would gladly ride to my local H.E.B., but the route is dangerous, not to mention unpleasant. Therefore, I think we should focus on accessibility, directness, and continuity of bike routes while analyzing and implementing land use policies that support paths, lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, etc, ” Diana said.

Road diet = war on cars
It sounds nice enough, but the part she leaves out is that part of the plan is to reduce auto lanes to make way for bikes and pedestrians. It’s not truly about offering more choices, but government deciding for you that cars are bad and cycling and walking are better alternatives to driving in your car. So under the guise of “sustainable transportation,” the real motive is to force people out of their cars and onto their feet or bikes to get around.

The MPO plans “to identify and analyze roadways that would benefit from a ‘road diet.’” It explains “a ‘road diet’ as a technique...to narrow the width of a road or lane or completely eliminate the through lane(s) to achieve...a more efficient, multi-modal street or roadway” under subtask 2.3 of the MPO’s Unified Planning Work Program. An MPO resolution supports achieving bike facilities through “restriping or through a road diet.” Only a government bureaucrat would call shrinking the number of auto lanes and replacing them with bike lanes an “efficient” roadway.

Here are some examples of how these policies have played out in Bexar County and around the state. First, since the “complete streets” policy was adopted by the MPO, on North New Braunfels Avenue between Ft. Sam Houston and Austin Highway the city came in and restriped it so that what used to function as two lanes in each direction is now one lane each way for autos with a dedicated bike lane in the space once used by autos. There has been no marked increase in cyclists, but the auto congestion has doubled.

Then, in recent weeks NW Military Highway between 1604 and 410 was expanded between Shavano Park to Castle Hills not for autos, but for a dedicated bike lane in each direction. So after all that time and money on a road expansion, they did not add ANY new auto lanes, only bike lanes including a 6-8 foot buffer lane of space between the auto and bike lanes without adding any new auto lanes as well.  The road remains congested. Next, Bexar County Flood Control Division condemned 30 homes, in 2009, using eminent domain along El Verde Road in order to expand Huebner Creek and to add hike and bike trails and to expand a park.

Also, the Alamo Regional Mobility Authority, another duplicative government agency, is currently conducting the required environmental study for both the US 281 and Loop 1604 toll projects, and both will be including bike and pedestrian facilities. There’s already discussion of completing a bike path that traverses under 1604 as part of the project. Yet all of these agencies repeatedly tell us there’s no money to fix/expand our roads without tolls, but we apparently have plenty of money for extensive frontage roads, sidewalks, bike trails, and lighting for those sidewalks and trails.

Finally, San Angelo just announced its award of $3.2 million in highway funds to build a bike trail. It turns out the cost works out to be over a million dollars PER MILE!

'Way to coerce people out of their cars'
Getting the picture yet? There’s a war on cars and politicians and bureaucrats are putting us on a “road diet” to force you out of your car and onto a hike & bike trail to help “solve” congestion. Naturally this also plays into the agenda of toll road advocates and bureaucrats that want free routes to remain congested to force you into paying tolls to get mobility. But is biking and walking really a practical solution for your daily commute and do you want your road taxes being used to expand roads for bikes only with no similar expansion for auto lanes? A larger agenda is at play and Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood wants gas taxes to fund non-motorized transportation: “It is a way to coerce people out of their cars. About everything we do around here is government intrusion in people's lives...So have at it.”

TX Legislature fails to pass anti-groping bill

Details
News
Link to article here.

Here's a link to Sen. Dan Patrick's account of the events. Conservatives wanted the Senate version to pass because Straus watered down and perpetually delayed the House version. But perhaps the real news of this TSA saga in the last few days has been Rick Perry's interview on Glenn Beck's Fox TV Show taking credit for the TSA anti-groping bill when he was dragged kicking and screaming to get him to add the bill to his call for the special session which Perry alone controls.

Lawmakers Call it Quits, Leave Unfinished Business

By Thanh Tan, Texas Tribune, June 29, 2011

The Senate's version of a bill to criminalize intrusive pat-downs by federal agents with the Transportation Security Administration has died in the House, after the chamber couldn't get the four-fifths vote needed to suspend the rules.

The 96-26 vote meant the measure couldn't pass before the end of the special session, so House lawmakers adjourned sine die.

That leaves two of Gov. Rick Perry's special session priorities — TSA and sanctuary cities — incomplete, but the governor doesn't seem compelled to call lawmakers back again.

“Although I am disappointed lawmakers did not finalize legislation that would have banned sanctuary cities, I commend the Legislature’s work to pass measures that further strengthen our legal system through loser pays lawsuit reform, uphold the integrity of the ballot box by requiring voters to present photo ID at polling places, protect unborn life by requiring an ultrasound before an abortion, strengthen private property rights, and increase penalties for individuals who participate in human trafficking," Perry said in a statement. "And although the airport pat-down bill did not pass, it did initiate a public discussion and some changes in airport security procedures."

While Democrats argued the TSA bill was political in nature and unfairly targeted at federal agents doing their job, Republicans in the House were more angry at the Senate's decision to adjourn early yesterday without passing HB 41, the House's version of the bill they said had been vetted by the attorney general's office. The Senate version was more strict, and House lawmakers had lingering concerns over whether it could withstand a challenge from the Department of Justice, which warned the state last month about the possibility of shutting down airports in Texas if TSA officers could not conduct screenings.

In response to the take it or leave it option before them, state Rep. Jim Keffer, R-Eastland, said, "It's insulting!" After the session adjourned, he went even further with his criticism of the Senate: "In my humble estimation, they have nothing to be proud of."

After it became apparent the bill was dead, Simpson spoke before the House and openly criticized leadership in both chambers. With House Speaker Joe Straus, who just last week referred to the TSA bill as a publicity stunt, standing behind him, the outspoken Republican said he believed House leadership had thwarted his effort to stop the "routine" touching of private parts by federal agents. Though his comments were received with a collective groaning sound from lawmakers, Simpson was undeterred.

During his 15-minute speech, Simpson said he is "fed up with phonies" and politicians who take credit for bills they try to kill. He quoted Churchill by saying, "Never yield to force... never yield to the overwhelming might of the enemy." On the TSA legislation, he declared, "I'm not giving up." The Longview Republican didn't limit his views to the TSA issue. He launched an all-out critique of the state budget, which he accused of being filled with accounting tricks and nowhere near conservative enough.

Immediately after Simpson finished, some members of the public sitting in the House gallery applauded his remarks before storming out of the room. "If you cowards don't protect us, we'll protect ourselves," screamed one man.

While Simpson stole the show, the real anger in the body continued to be directed at the Senate. Lawmakers passed HB 79, a comprehensive judicial reorganization bill, but not without some direct hazing of the measure's Senate sponsor, Sen. Robert Duncan, R-Lubbock. Lawmakers had to remind members of the House that the bill had been in the works for six years and originated in the House. Just last night, the governor and the House blamed Duncan for stripping the sanctuary cities ban from SB 1. (The Senate promptly came to his defense). Today, Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, chastised Duncan for refusing to consider his amendment to HB 79 that would have banned Sharia law in Texas. Tensions reached a peak as State Rep. Lois Kolkhorst stood at the back microphone, launching into her own tirade against the Senate leaving the House hanging. A loud banging noise could be heard in the gallery, prompting Kolkhorst to say, "Am I about to be shot in the head?"

With no major bills left on the agenda, Straus pounded the gavel around noon and declared the special session over. After praising the House for holding the line on a tax increase and setting an austere budget, Straus told reporters he did not take Simpson's comments too personally. He said every member of the House is entitled to an opportunity to speak and the version of the Senate bill Simpson championed simply came "too late" to pass.

"I think he's disappointed," Straus said. "I've spent a lot of time over the past couple weeks trying to help him. I think that it's unanimous here in the House, the goal of making sure that our TSA employees are reasonable in their searches. It was the methodology and the specifics of his bill that a lot of House members thought needed work."

Indeed, Simpson said he is already re-working HB 41 and drafting additional legislation that would require more training for TSA agents, whom he said lack the same skills as peace officers. He stood by his statements against the leadership, too. "It could have been done earlier," he said of the bill, which he claims had the votes to pass during the regular session before the Department of Justice intervened. To do all this, Simpson will have to be re-elected by his district. Today, he confirmed he will run for a second term.

Straus was also asked about his future plans, and he responded that he filed the appropriate paperwork to run for a third term as speaker last month. He said he had not planned to start campaigning until the session adjourned.

"Now that we're out of the called special session, it's time to get back to politics, but I think reading the mood of the members, which is a big part of my job, that it's time for everyone to take a couple weeks off, to reconnect with our families, to take vacations... and the time to realize that we've been here for 170 days and we all need a break," Straus said.

Though conservative groups have encouraged lawmakers to withhold their so-called "pledge cards," Straus said he has never collected those cards himself, and does not plan to start doing it anytime soon.

House Democratic leader Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, acknowledged members of her caucus were largely on the sidelines the past two days, watching the supermajority nearly fall apart.

"It looks like a conflict from within. Their rhetoric is not sustainable," she told the Tribune. "However, Simpson actually made our argument when he said the budget is smoke and mirrors."

Now that both chambers have adjourned, Farrar predicts Texans will begin to see the effects of the public policy decisions made this session.

"What we'll see in the interim is what cuts will do to the schools. You won't see a lot of people defending their decisions," Farrar said.

Another toll hike for DFW commuters

Details
News

Link to article here.

The arrogance of this out of control un-elected toll authority is downright despicable. To say the authority "must  keep charging more" and "it's either pay me now or pay me later" when there's high unemployment, high gas prices, and many people losing their homes and cars due to the downturn, now is certainly not the time for a tax increase. This is what happens when UN-elected bureaucrats make tax decisions. The NTTA doesn't have to answer to the taxpaying public who cannot pressure these people to lower tolls or keep toll taxes at reasonable rates. Their board doesn't even have to vote publicly for these tax increases as is required of other agencies, AND they can automatically increase tolls every two years from here on out without accountability or transparency of where this money is going.

Then to have some elected officials in Arlington advocating charging "market" rate tolls that would jack up the toll rates as high as people are willing to pay before they stop taking the road...These people are greedy, irresponsible, unaccountable scoundrels! Notice the reporter doesn't publish their names. Okay Arlington, find out who they are and make them pay political retribution!

The NTTA's statements affirm they're not interested in more customers (because that means a higher operation and maintenance cost), they actually want to shed customers so they can make more money on the schmucks stuck taking their toll roads.

"Without the toll rate hikes, which Davis said should pull in an extra $18 million to $20 million next year, NTTA would have to rely on increased traffic on its highways to keep its finances in line."

The article also states that the reason for the toll hikes are due to NTTA taking on new projects. Why should current customers pay to cover the costs of other new toll roads? According to testimony in the House Transportation Committee, there are no longer toll viable roads in Texas. They've all been built. Now they're raiding from every source of taxpayer money they can get their hands on to SUBSIDIZE LOSER toll projects they have no business building as a toll road.

“This allows us to take these rate increases in little pieces and avoid the massive 30 to 40 percent increases that we would have to impose otherwise whenever we decided to take on a new road,” Davis said.

The ol' stealing from Peter to pay Paul trick...he "independent" audit of the NTTA can't come fast enough!
__________________________________________________________

NTTA raising Dallas-area tolls 6 percent Friday
BY MICHAEL A. LINDENBERGER
Dallas Morning News
28 June 2011

Drivers will spend more to use area toll roads beginning Friday.

Rates will creep up about 6 percent to 15.3 cents a mile, an amount that will mean nearly $40 more a year for toll-paying commuters who drive 10 miles each way to work and back.

The increase is unusual because it will take effect without any action by the North Texas Tollway Authority board, which voted 8-1 in 2009 to schedule automatic increases that will take place every two years forever, or until the board votes to end them.

Unlike Dallas Area Rapid Transit, which is required by federal law to hold hearings and to vote at least twice on a fare increase, NTTA can set rates as it chooses. In an interview last week, board member Bob Day, the lone dissenter in 2009, said he remains opposed to the increase — both on principle and because he thinks now is a bad time to ask drivers to pay more.

“I didn’t think we needed that large of an increase, and secondly the timing is wrong,” said Day, former mayor of Garland. “And third, I am basically against automatic increases.”

Despite Day’s opposition, there has been no discussion by his colleagues since to revisit the issue.

Tuesday, NTTA chief financial officer Janice Davis defended the increase as not just good for NTTA, but good for drivers’ pocketbooks, too.

“Looking at this strictly from the viewpoint of the drivers, this is really a ‘pay me now or pay me later’ situation,” Davis said.

NTTA owes about $8 billion to bondholders, almost of all which it has taken on since 2008, when it borrowed $5 billion to cover construction costs for the Sam Rayburn Tollway and the $3.2 billion it paid local governments in return for winning the right to collect tolls on that road.

Strong credit

Despite owing so much, NTTA has maintained strong credit ratings, partly because it has pledged to ensure its revenue remains at least 1.5 times as high as the payments it makes each year on its senior debt.

Davis said by deciding to schedule automatic increases, rather than ask the board or the public each time, the authority gains an additional advantage. It can guarantee creditors that the revenue will keep going up — even if traffic is flat — unless the board takes the unlikely step of acting to end the increases.

In turn, creditors reward NTTA with lower interest rates, Davis said.

She said that even without the scheduled increases, NTTA would still have to vote to raise its rates every few years, and probably by much larger amounts each time to enable it to finance the roads that local officials want it to build.

“This allows us to take these rate increases in little pieces and avoid the massive 30 to 40 percent increases that we would have to impose otherwise whenever we decided to take on a new road,” Davis said.

Day said he understands the business case for the automatic increases but said the benefits do not justify dealing the public out of the board’s rate-setting decisions.

“As a former mayor, I believe we’ve got to decide publicly every time we want to charge our customers more,” he said, noting that with a vote comes the opportunity for public input.

But Chairman Victor Vandergriff, in a statement explaining the increase earlier this month, said it’s a necessary step by NTTA “to maintain a viable financial system and to deliver the many mobility projects that bring growth to the North Texas region.”

What market will bear

Elected officials on the Regional Transportation Council in Arlington have urged NTTA for years to adopt a more aggressive rate policy.

The council wants NTTA to charge drivers like a private company would by setting rates closer to the maximum drivers would pay before they stopped using the toll roads.

That “market-rate” approach will soon be tested in its purest form on the managed lanes being built with regional council approval by private firms throughout North Texas, the first of which will open about 2015.

Those roads — including LBJ Freeway when improvements are complete in 2016 — will offer special lanes that will cost drivers several times what NTTA charges.

In return, those lanes will have a guaranteed minimum speed of 50 mph no matter how crowded the corridor becomes.

The increases will mean big money over time for NTTA, which already collects more money in tolls than DART does in sales taxes and fares combined from its 13 member cities.

This year, NTTA expects to collect $396 million in tolls. By 2024, toll receipts are expected to be $1 billion a year — 10 times the amount of sales taxes collected by DART this year across its member cities.

A surer route

Because NTTA’s annual debt payments are also expected to balloon in coming years — they will total $371.5 million by 2015 — the authority must keep collecting more revenue.

Without the toll rate hikes, which Davis said should pull in an extra $18 million to $20 million next year, NTTA would have to rely on increased traffic on its highways to keep its finances in line.

That would be an uncertain bet, because even though business has been good at NTTA, the combined effects of lingering unemployment, high gas prices and higher rates mean that traffic is likely to be lower in coming years than NTTA advisers had expected.

Privatized Indiana Toll Road headed for bankruptcy

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Link to article here.

The poster child for road privatization gurus is headed for bankruptcy which may not seem like much in these economic times, but its a MASSIVE indictment against privatization advocates that have strapped taxpayers with oppressive tax increases on driving (doubling the toll rates in just 5 years) and crushing debt for generations.

Here's what a supporter penned at the news:

The big Indiana toll deal is living on borrowed time. Its reserve
account will run dry in Q1 2012. It is losing money so they have to come
up with more capital or quit. They'll default. This is bigger than all
of the previous failures combined.

Cintra and Macquarie split this concession 50-50. They took over the
existing IH 80(?) passing through Indiana. They put a lot of cash into
fixing up the road and installing toll equipment. They also paid the
state of Indiana $3.8 billion for the right to collect tolls for 75 years.

The toll is about 5 cents per mile. I think they are allowed to increase
the toll but that doesn't help. Every penny increase drives away enough
users to cause a bigger loss. They are caught in a cruel vice.

These geniuses borrowed the money for a 75 year deal on a 10 year note.
Due in 2015. Maybe they thought they could do a re-fi at CountryWide
Mortgage Company

The State of Indiana is a huge winner. They got $3.8 billion for nothing.

There is a lot more to this story that is not presented in the article. ...

Vince

London news wire says Indiana TR concession in financial trouble

Posted on Sun, 2011-06-26 22:57
Toll Road News

 Debtwire, a London Financial Times wire service claims the Indiana Toll Road Concession Company (ITRCC) is in danger of defaulting on its debt as early as the first months of next year (2012). The wire says ITRCC has been rapidly "burning through" an interest reserve account which threatens to put it out of compliance with reserve provisions of its $4.1b in bonds.

The principal lender to ITRCC is the Royal Bank of Scotland which Debtwire says has assigned the loan to its "workout" department. The wire report says the interest reserve account could be depleted by the end of 2011.

ITRCC is a joint 50/50 percent venture of Cintra and Macquarie. A Cintra spokesman said merely that the reserve account was intended for drawing upon during a recession and low traffic like that presently experienced by the US. A Macquarie spokesman said simply that no default is expected.

Traffic and revenue have been well below expectation since the 75 year concession was signed with the state of Indiana at the height of the boom  in June 2006.  Toll revenues in 2010 were $164.2m versus interest expense on debt of $268m.

There were $9m of non-toll revenues mostly from the leasing of rest stops for total  revenue of $173.3m.

Expenses included toll collection $9.6m, routine repairs and maintenance $8.7m, other operating costs $16.3m  for total operating expense before depreciation of $34.5m. That generates EBITDA (earnings before of interest taxes depreciation and amortization) of $138.8m. Depreciation and amortization was $79.7m making a profit before interest expenses of $59.1m.

It's $268m in interest expense that is killing the ITRCC.

In 2010 that interest plus a derivative loss (from hedging interest rate swaps) of $51.9m converted a modest operating profit into the net loss of $260.8m.

In mid-2006 ITRCC paid the state of Indiana $3.8b in one-time rent for the 75 year concession on the road. Cintra and Macquarie each put in $374m to produce an equity at start of $748m. They borrowed $4.1b.

They appear to be paying 6.5% interest to the Royal Bank of Scotland and associated lenders (268/4100). The bulk of the debt on the concession ($3,685m) is less-than-10 year debt due in 2015.

The concessionaires made major capital improvements including third laning in the west, and other bridge and pavement repair as well as an improved toll system.

Transactions 35% low

Traffic is reported by Macquarie as 74.6k/average day or 27.2m/yr in 2010.

We don't know what traffic and revenue forecasts Cintra and Macquarie used, but forecasting for the state (INDOT) was Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) "Rate Review and Revenue Projections Study" August 2005.  Indiana Finance Authority commissioned Crowe Chizek & Company's "Indiana East-West Toll Road Financial Analysis" dated March 2006.

WSA had a forecast of transactions and revenues in six different columns, each for a different combination of toll rates (see nearby). At the time of the forecast the ITR had toll rates of 4c/mile for cars and 14.6c/mile for tractor trailers, while by WSA estimate maximum revenue would be gained with tolls of around 13c/mile for cars and 44c/mile for the big rigs.

Toll rates under state control were about a third of the market or revenue maximizing rates!

They've been pushed up a bit according to the maxima allowed by the concession - to 5.6c/mile for cars and 22.4c/mile for tractor trailers at present and another small increase goes into effect July 1. That puts them between two WSA transactions forecast columns 47.2m and 37.8m. If the middle point is used you get 42m as the forecast for current toll rates so actual 27.2m traffic is a huge shortfall - about 35%.

$s down 17% on forecast

Toll revenue using the same 'middling' should be $196m for 2010 compared to actual $164m, making it a 17% shortfall on forecast.

(Traffic so-called is actually toll transactions and the ITR is a barrier system of toll points over the mainline in its western commuter heavy/car heavy portion, versus a ticket system in its long stretch east which is almost a truckway. Transaction counts overweight the importance of the barrier portion and commuter car traffic because a relatively short trip there may be 2 or 3 transactions whereas all trips on the ticket portion are the single transaction even for driving its length. Traffic has obviously dropped most on the barrier system portion out west.)

Crowe Chizek & Co assumed much smaller debt by the concessionaire and higher equity - about one tenth the debt ITRCC actually assumed. Debt service was put at a mere $24.8m in 2010 versus the actual $268m in interest.

COMMENT: That's where the problem lies - assuming far too much debt for too variable and uncertain a revenue stream. Easy to say in retrospect though many said at the time that at 40x they paid too high a multiple of cash flow. Even if their traffic were at WSA forecast levels, and even with market toll rates as opposed to concession regulated toll rates, they'd still only have toll revenues of $245m. And with interest payments to be made to borrowers of $268m they'd still be losing money. They must have thought that somehow, someway they could muddle through. Maybe they still can? We'll see. But this time they can't blame forecasters for their troubles - editor.

Demerging and stapling

The Macquarie interest in ITR held originally by Macquarie Infrastructure Group along with other weak tollroads was divested (they used the goddawful word 'demerged') Feb 2010 to two entities with the name Macquarie Atlas Roads, one with the ending International Limited (MARIL), the other just Limited (MARL) managed jointly by Macquarie Atlas Roads (MQA).

At Macquarie they love to "staple" equities - a peculiarly Australian arrangement - meaning that one stock cannot be bought or sold without buying or selling the other. They call the stapled security of one MARL and one MARIL share Macquarie Atlas Roads (MQA) which security trades on the Australian Stock Exchanges.

This complicated duplication of companies followed by their forced marriage looks like a makework racket by corporate lawyers Downunner.

https://www.getizoom.com/index.jsp

http://www.macquarie.com/mgl/com/mqa

http://www.macquarie.com/mgl/com/mqa/asset-portfolio/indiana-toll-road

annual report

http://www.macquarie.com/dafiles/Internet/mgl/com/mqa/asset-portfolio/do...

TOLLROADSnews 2011-06-26 ADDITIONS, EDITS 2011-06-27 11:30

U.S. to cut highway funding by nearly $10 billion

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Link to article here.

Perhaps the most shocking stat in the article is the fact that 75 of our U.S. Interstate highways are already tolled. This is why Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison and Pennsylvania lawmakers, John Peterson and Phil English, worked so hard to keep tolls off our interstates. These people will stop at NOTHING to tap the revenue stream of taxpayers. They exploit congestion weary commuters by refusing to spend our gas taxes to fix our roads (currently both federal and state lawmakers habitually raid our gas taxes for non-road uses) so they can extort money from us saying we have to pay tolls to get our roads fixed.

Declining US money for highways - where tolling fits in

Posted on Fri, 2011-06-24 00:37
Toll Road News

 Kenneth Orski who follows transport funding issues in Washington DC says US Government grants to the states for highways will drop from the current level of $41b/year to about $32b next year based on the end of deficit financing under a newly budget conscious House of Representatives. That $32b will be the result of relying solely on federal gas/diesel tax revenues - as we used to before the massive deficit spending of 'stimulus' funds the past three years. (see Orski at www.innobriefs.com)

It's a return to highway users "paying their way" and "living within our means" Orski says citing the popular mantras that now set the tone for US Government budgeting for surface transportation. Handouts for highspeed rail will - hopefully - be zeroed out, and other rail folliescontained. Unsustainable 'sustainability' and 'livability' nonsense won't survive the result of last November's election, and the changed composition of the US Congress.

Too much attention is sometimes to Washington DC's role. States and local governments raise fully three times as much for highways as federal funding, Orski points out. They of course face their own budgetary constraints, and lack state 'Reserve' banks with the power to print US$s. And there is almost no stomach in any legislature to raise gas/diesel tax rates - politically directed highway programs are so distrusted.

Some states have been 'borrowing up' heavily themselves for highways loading up on TIFIA and GARVE (grant anticipation) bonds, so an increasing proportion of their gas tax funds and US money goes not to new roads but to paying for past loan-based spending.

IBTTA had a useful panel this week on the major opportunity for tolling in the US - funding the rebuild of the Interstate highway system. Ed Regan of Wilbur Smith Associates gave another of his masterful analyses of the issue and a collection of others gave variations on the theme.

Key point Regan makes is that the cost of essential rebuilding of the Interstate Highways is way bigger than the costs incurred in original construction. What we have now cost around $130b but the cost of rebuilding is in the range $1,300b to $2,500b in current prices - ten to twenty times higher. If spread over 50 years that's an annual expenditure in the range $26b to $50b.

Some of the increase is general inflation, but some is real extra cost - construction under traffic is inherently more expensive than greenfields construction, and we build better than we used to in many respects.

Tolling could take on the job of rebuilding the interstates. Current toll revenues are around $10b, and they would need to be increased at least three-fold to take on the Interstate Rebuild job, which Regan calls "probably the most important transport investment in American history."

The opportunity arises out of:

- states desperate for new and sustainable revenue sources

- the greater acceptability and lower cost of all-electronic tolling as compared to earlier methods

- direct user charges and paying-your-way being a theme of the times since it allocates cost directly to those who benefit

- the power of variable and differentiated toll rates to manage traffic and offer free flow

- the potential to tap investor money and management with PPPs

- the states own the interstates so they ultimately carry the responsibility for rebuilds

7% of the interstate system (2,921 miles of 48,000) are already tolled plus most of the large bridge and tunnel crossings. 3,175 miles in 17 systems were built as tollroads. Some 254 miles and four systems (CT Tpk 129, DFW Tpk 30, KY Tpk 45, Richmond-Petersberg VA 50) were unfortunately detolled.

Most of the tollroads built in the past 10 years have been non-Interstate in classification,  but around half of the new expressway mileage built in that time has been tollroads.

Regan makes the point that tolls represent something of a return to President Franklin Delanor Roosevelt's concept of a system that would be "self liquidating" with tolls and corridor property rights. And to the fact that it started out with 17 toll systems as its basis. The oldest Interstate in the country is I-76 in central Pennsylvania: the Pennsylvania Turnpike.

Trouble is so far the US Congress and the Obama administration cling to their legislative bar on tolling the interstates. Indeed both Secretary Ray LaHood and House committee chair John  Mica have said they support tolls for new capacity but oppose its use on existing capacity.

There's little demand for new capacity, but a huge demand for rebuild funds and the management power of tolling. And for its ability to allocate money where it will be most productively used - which the political process does a dismal job of.

see http://www.ibtta.org/contentnoleftnav.cfm?ItemNumber=5202&token=47104&us...



Emanuel: Corporate tax holiday to get Infrastructure Bank buy-in

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Link to article here.

What's really amazing about this article is Rahm Emanuel's influence post-White House Chief-of-Staff turned Mayor of Chicago. But the fact his proposal is a form of bribery (they call an 'incentive') of public officials and a special interest giveaway is not surprising...there's a reason Michele Malkin calls the Federal Infrastructure Bank "corporate welfare."

Corporate Tax Holiday Could Create Infrastructure Bank -- But Devil Is In The Details

By Matt Sledge, Huffington Post
First Posted: 06/22/11 06:32 PM ET Updated: 06/22/11 11:25 PM ET
 
 
Rahm Emanuel has a proposition. A grand one, for big business, big unions, and Congress: let a corporate income tax holiday pay for a national infrastructure bank.

Let multinationals bring their money home -- the money that's parked overseas, dodging Uncle Sam's corporate income taxes -- and the federal government can use some of it to pay for the infrastructure bank, the newly minted mayor of Chicago says.

Unions, big corporations, and potentially members of both parties: a virtual rainbow coalition may be assembling in favor of the infrastructure bank. But corporate watchdogs charge there's no difference between a tax holiday with a bank and a tax holiday without one.

Under Emanuel's plan, which he is developing with Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the bank would build the bridges, roads and mass transit that America has been neglecting for decades. As these structures rust and fall apart, oftentimes nothing new is being built in their place. Yet money to improve infrastructure money will not be easy to come by in the midst of a protracted deficit debate; by including the tax holiday, Emanuel's proposition aims to win over Republicans leery of adding to the deficit.

The idea for the bank is not new -- former Service Employees International Union President Andy Stern mooted it in an op-ed piece months ago -- but it seems to be gaining renewed attention. Reed Hundt and Thomas Mann wrote about it in the Washington Post last week, Emanuel treated it as his own in a speech to the U.S. Conference of Mayors on Saturday, and now Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is feeling out the Senate.

For proponents, the hope is that the proposition could unite Democrats in the Senate and Republicans in the House. Emanuel said he thinks his grand compromise "brings the parties together."

The specific terms of the tax holiday, however, would be critical. Some Democrats don't want to give multinationals a free pass, and Republicans don't want to be too hard on corporate America.

Without some sort of deal, it's possible that money could continue to linger offshore -- parked in anticipation of a better deal from a different Congress. That has been the situation since 2005, when another tax holiday was declared, premised on the idea that it would create jobs; it didn't.

Critics of any sort of tax holiday say that the infrastructure bank is just the latest twist on corporate blackmail.

"Every one of these amnesties encourage greater holding offshore and Congress is being irresponsible even to say they are thinking about it," said Calvin Johnson, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law who specializes in tax law.

Former SEIU chief Andy Stern disagreed. "The problem is the money hasn't come back, there's no reason to believe it will ever come back," said Stern, now a senior fellow at Georgetown University Public Policy Institute.

"Details are appropriate and important -- you know, what's the tax rate? -- but we're now in the right framework," he argued.

In his speech to the mayors, Emanuel said he would like to see the tax rate lowered to 10 or 15 percent, down from its current 35 percent, for the tax holiday. The money the government raises from those taxes would then be directed only to the infrastructure bank, ensuring, in his view, that it would actually be used to create jobs.

Such a cut on the corporate income tax rate, however, might not sit well with small businesses, who can't use creative accounting to hide their profits overseas like the multinational corporations. And a cut to 10% might not be steep enough to win over Republicans in the House, who have been talking about taxing repatriated income at a rate in the low single digits. In the Senate, Schumer has reportedly suggested a 5% rate.

Rep. DeLauro told HuffPost that she's working with Emanuel to find a balance, and she is hopeful that Republicans can be convinced to sign on to their plan. DeLauro said she has been working on plans for an infrastructure bank for 14 years, and found the recent discussion of the idea "very encouraging."

"The concept of an infrastructure bank has wide support -- from the U.S. Chamber, from labor unions, from a whole bunch of people in between," she said.

Robert McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice, isn't one of those people. He said there was "no substantive difference" between a straight tax holiday and one that was combined with an infrastructure bank. "It's just somebody's wacky idea that the problem the world faces today is a lack of capital. Our problem is there's not enough consumer demand. The government should be out there shoving money out the door and stimulating the economy."

"This bank is going to be just another bank -- they could have given the money to SunTrust, you know?" he said.

DeLauro said capitalizing the bank via a tax holiday was not her first choice, but she thought that it would be a good approach in the GOP-controlled House.

"If we are going to have another repatriation holiday, the federal government should use the incoming revenue to capitalize a national infrastructure bank, and we do know that such an entity creates jobs, long-term economic growth," DeLauro said.

Tying the repatriation to a larger reform of corporate income taxes is also critical in her mind. "Any repatriation effort has got to be a bridge to broader corporate tax reform. We have to close tax loopholes," she said.

Her infrastructure bank plan would leverage money from corporations and the federal government to create projects that include public-private partnerships. Because of the federal backing, loans for the projects could be issued at low rates.

Such arrangements are common overseas; some have pointed to the European Investment Bank as a model for what could be created here.

The United States has relatively fewer infrastructure projects that are operated as public-private partnerships, and any ventures that smacked of privatization might prove controversial. A privately owned toll road created with lending from the infrastructure bank, for instance, might charge a high rate to pay off its government loan. Criticism might also arise if the arrangement's big winners are the same multinationals benefiting from the tax holiday, as opposed to small businesses.

Spain's rush to privatize falls flat, toll roads empty

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Link to article here.

The finger-pointing over road privatization has commenced, but perhaps the best assessment below is this: "bad planing and excessive spending." The drumbeat for taxpayer-funded bailouts for this infrastructure mess that'll be deemed too big to fail begins...

June 24, 2011

Spain’s Building Spree Leaves Some Airports and Roads Begging to Be Used

By RAPHAEL MINDER

New York Times

MADRID — In March, local officials inaugurated a new airport in Castellón, a small city on Spain’s Mediterranean coast. They are still waiting for the first scheduled flight.

To justify the grand opening, Carlos Fabra, the head of Castellón’s provincial government, argued that it was a unique opportunity to turn an airport into a tourist attraction, giving visitors full access to the runway and other areas normally off-limits. This Sunday, it will be used as the starting point for part of Spain’s national cycling championships, featuring the three-time Tour de France champion Alberto Contador.

Castellón Airport, built at a cost of 150 million euros ($213 million), is not the only white elephant that now dots Spain’s infrastructure landscape. Spain’s first privately held airport — in Ciudad Real in central Spain — was forced to enter bankruptcy proceedings a year ago because of a similar lack of traffic.

Across the country, nearly empty toll roads are struggling to turn a profit. Other projects are surviving only with continued public financing, which has been cast into doubt by Europe’s sovereign debt crisis.

Over the last 18 months, Spain has been in investors’ line of fire after permitting its budget deficit to balloon during a long property bubble, which finally burst alongside the worldwide financial crisis. To clean up the mess, the Socialist government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero introduced austerity measures last year that, among other things, shrank spending on infrastructure. That has left some projects in limbo, despite political pledges to keep them alive.

Over the last two decades, Spain built transportation networks at a rate that few other European countries approached.

Having opened its first high-speed train connection between Madrid and Seville in 1992, Spain overtook France last December as the country operating Europe’s biggest high-speed rail network, covering just over 2,000 kilometers, or 1,200 miles.

Growth in road and air transport has been just as spectacular. Between 1999 and 2009, Spain added over 5,000 kilometers of highways — the biggest road construction endeavor in Europe. And its 43 international airports handle more cross-border passengers than any other country in Europe.

Such expansion has been a source of intense national pride. It has also brought major economic benefits to some previously isolated and impoverished regions.

Yet like Castellón Airport, not all the projects were necessarily well thought out. Some experts suggest that Spain’s approach to development during the boom years placed speed ahead of risk assessment.

Joseph Santo, logistics and transportation director in the Iberian subsidiary of the consulting firm Booz & Company, said there were differences between Spain and Britain, for example, when it came to forming so-called public-private partnerships in transportation.

“In the U.K, they try to get everything into the agreement ahead of time and think of every contingency, so that it can take years to negotiate the deal,” Mr. Santo said. “In Spain, they do the reverse. They make the deal in six months and then if something comes up, they see how they can fix it.”

In separate interviews, the heads of some of Spain’s largest construction and infrastructure management companies conceded that spending had gotten out of control before the crisis. But they also predicted that most building projects, particularly in transport, would eventually yield profits.

“The problem is that such projects are generally conceived at a time when everything seems bound to succeed — even sometimes badly conceived projects — and there were no doubt some planning problems,” said Salvador Alemany, the chairman of Abertis, an infrastructure management company that is based in Barcelona. “At the same time, such projects have to live with the realities of an economic cycle that brings lows as well as highs, and there are plenty of examples of highways around the world that had difficult takeoffs.”

Baldomero Falcones, chairman and chief executive of FCC, a builder, recalled the painful opening of toll roads in the region of Catalonia in the 1970s — roads that have recently required expansion to cope with soaring traffic.

“I have never seen any transport infrastructure that at the end of the day has not proved profitable,” he said.

To help raise money, the government has recently intensified efforts to privatize some state-owned infrastructure, including the country’s two biggest airports, Barajas in Madrid and El Prat in Barcelona.

In May, the Spanish secretary of state for transportation, Isaías Táboas, said the government would sell operating concessions for the two airports by the end of the year. Iñigo Meirás, chief executive of Ferrovial, said his company was “seriously considering taking part in the tender process,” with Abertis also expected to be among the bidders.

With a general election coming in March, the issue of public spending has also fed political tensions.

José Blanco, the industry minister, has accused the previous center-right government of José María Aznar of “bad planning and excessive spending,” telling Parliament that Mr. Aznar’s government paid four times as much as it should have to expropriate land on which additional roads were then built.

Things have become so bad that the private operators of one of the roads, which links the Spanish capital and Toledo, started litigation last year against the government, seeking changes to the terms of its concession that would permit it to collect tolls for a longer time.

Mr. Alemany from Abertis noted that the Madrid-Toledo case was not the only one of its kind. “There are certainly a few other projects where a solution needs to be found to avoid a crisis outcome,” he said.

But he expressed optimism that most disputes would be settled out of court.

“I do think that something can be negotiated that would avoid legal conflicts that could certainly prove costly and lengthy,” he said.

Mr. Blanco suggested in November that the government would overhaul the toll road system to help operators of unprofitable roads, notably by extending their concessions.

Mr. Blanco also has pledged to keep on schedule certain projects that have turned into significant electoral pledges for the governing Socialists in some regions of Spain, like extending the high-speed rail network to the southeastern cities of Alicante, Murcia and Cartagena by 2014, as well as adding a link to the northwestern region of Galicia.

Mr. Falcones of FCC suggested that the biggest problems were likely to come from other types of underused infrastructure that do not stand the test of time as well as roads. The debt crisis and the slump in construction have also left Spain with several half-built or deserted museums, stadiums, public libraries, administrative offices and shopping malls.

Still, when it comes to transportation infrastructure, even Castellón’s deserted airport could have a future, Mr. Falcones predicted, as a gateway to some of Spain’s most popular beaches.

“It’s not worked out so far, but a flight from Castellón to Manchester or Frankfurt is quite imaginable,” he said.

Indiana Toll Road: Tolls more than doubled five yrs after privatization

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Link to article here.

Indiana Toll Road lease: Five years later

By David Tanner, Land Line associate editor

June 27, 2011

Before Gov. Mitch Daniels leased the Indiana Toll Road to private investors in 2006, professional trucker Randy Nace would occasionally use the tollway even though it carried a $14 toll. Several toll increases later, with truckers set to pay $35.20 starting Friday, July 1, residents like Nace are reminded of why they fought so hard against the privatization deal.

“I still think it was the wrong thing to do,” Nace said from his truck on Monday. He says he’s managed to survive cost increases and the economic downturn in part by avoiding the Indiana Toll Road.

Five years ago this week, on June 29, 2006, Gov. Mitch Daniels leased the tollway to Cintra of Spain and Macquarie of Australia in exchange for $3.85 billion in cash. To date, it’s still the largest privatization deal involving a U.S. roadway and certainly one of the most controversial.

“I don’t think the people really wanted it, but they went ahead and did it,” said Nace, an OOIDA member who makes his home in Monticello, IN.
Nace and a group of plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in 2006 in an attempt to block the lease deal while it was still in the Indiana Legislature. OOIDA supported the plaintiffs in their fight against the toll road lease.

Even though they didn’t win, the plaintiffs showed resolve and helped educate the public about long-term roadway leases built on profit margins.

The 151 percent toll increase realized during the first five years of the Indiana Toll Road lease was part of a guarantee to the investors. After this year, investors will continue to increase tolls at or above the rate of inflation, likely around 3 percent.

When highways become profit centers, the end user is left holding the bag.

“Indiana’s got some of the roughest interstate highways in the nation,” says Nace.

In the U.S. House and Senate, lawmakers are currently drafting long-term legislation that could set rules for tolling in the future. Indications are that the House version could emphasize more public-private partnerships for roadway infrastructure.

Nace says instead of selling off the nation’s highways, lawmakers should heed the philosophy of President Eisenhower.

“We ought to start an ‘Ike Was Right’ campaign – because that’s how we’d like to see highways funded,” he said. “There’s no need to have any toll roads at all. It could all be taken care of at the fuel pump.”

Financial woes?
According to reports, the consortium that leased the Indiana Toll Road in 2006 isn’t on great footing right now. The Financial Times says the Cintra-Macquarie consortium, doing business as ITR Concession Co., has been burning through an account that is supposed to act as a buffer against $4 billion in loans, according to the article, which adds that the company could end up in default.

Land Line has not been able to independently verify the claim, but the recent economic downturn and decline in traffic on the roadway certainly cannot be good news for the operators.

“I don’t think they reaped as much from the investment as they thought they would,” said owner-operator Mark Elrod, an OOIDA life member from Peru, IN.

He says he hasn’t used the Indiana Toll Road at all since it was “sold” in 2006, although he admits he’s not in the region very often.

Elrod points out that the legislation that created the Indiana Toll Road in the 1950s stated that the tolls would come off once the roadway was paid off. That obviously hasn’t happened, and it’s not about to happen anytime soon because the Cintra-Macquarie lease is scheduled to last through 2081.

“It shouldn’t be a lifelong cash cow,” Elrod said.

The issue of privatization brings out all sides, but one thing most truckers agree on is that existing taxpayer highways should not be converted into toll roads.

“I’m not against a public-private partnership if it’s done right,” Elrod said. “One thing I’m definitely against is tolling existing roads.”

Tolling wouldn’t bother truckers so much, Elrod says, if the projects involved new highways or lane capacity, also known as “greenfield” projects. He says greenfield projects paid for with tolls would be OK as long as highway users benefit and the tolls are removed once construction is paid for.

Copyright © OOIDA

Grimm: Privatization reaps 'corruption'

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Link to article here.

"The speakers just avoided discussing the scary aspect of privatization — how to keep public assets from getting gobbled up, for below fair-market prices, by Florida’s political bag men. They’re pretending not to see the unseemly potential of putting public institutions up for sale. They didn’t mention the influence peddlers who’ve co-opted so much of state and city and county government."

Posted on Sat, Jun. 25, 2011

Privatization’s unspoken risk: Corruption


By Fred Grimm
Miami Herald
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

The future of government runs for 10.5 miles through the heart of Broward County, amid rocks and dust and earth-moving equipment and trucks and workers along Interstate 595, where motorists can look out their car windows and contemplate another three years of traffic hell.

Don’t think of them as commuters, stewing in their gridlocked resentment, cursing the knucklehead government planners who created this transportation mess. Think of them as potential customers for Actividades de Construcción y Servicios S.A., the Spanish highway and tunnel builder. You see brutal traffic jams. ACS sees a business opportunity — 180,000 potential customers a day of whom no small percentage will happily pay for the opportunity to zoom along on a fast private highway running parallel to the unwashed (and unmoving) masses.

It’s a brilliant business plan, nearly diabolical. After four years of construction exacerbating the already torturous traffic jams on I-595, even cheapskate commuters will be exhausted and ready to pay whatever ACS demands. Call it a toll, or call it extortion.


So the company is spending $1.8 billion up front, building two reversible toll lanes down the once grassy medium, which in the old days might have been considered public right of way. The notion of public is so passé, so 2010. ACS, with the state’s blessing, will be taking the free out of freeway. It’s the new ideal in Florida, squeezing profit and (maybe, hopefully, fingers crossed) efficiency out of government functions.

On Friday, outside a Marriott Hotel on Fort Lauderdale Beach, demonstrators near the entrance indicated that not everyone’s thrilled by the private business takeovers of public institutions. They held signs demanding, “Stop the War on Workers.”

If public workers felt left out of Florida’s first privatization conference, they weren’t out of the discussion. Cities and counties and state agencies were said to be leasing out government operations like hamburger franchises to cope with escalating worker pensions and health care costs, intransigent unions and rigid civil service structures. A city official from a community that had privatized water and sewer utilities said it was worth it, now that the private contractor’s human resources director, rather than him, had to deal with the worker “who had come in drunk for the fourth time.”

Much of the talk was about raising capital for major infrastructure projects. Private corporations, it was said, can cut years off the time it would take the government to finance and build big projects. The five-year I-595 project would have taken the state 20 years to build. And there was talk of how private companies were less risk adverse than public officials, cowed by their need to mollify the baying crowd.

But not much was said about the potential corruption that dogs public-private deals, which was like describing war without mentioning that there might be casualties.

Along with the I-595 project, the conference focused on two privatization success stories — water and sewage utilities owned by the city of Live Oak and in Clay County, both now enjoying improved service and lower costs. But those nice folks from Live Oak and Green Cove Springs come from another universe. South Florida probably has more lobbyists than Live Oak, population 7,000, has public workers. South Florida has elected officials in prison or facing trial on charges that they concocted their very own special public-private partnerships. Hey Toto, this ain’t Kansas, we’re trying to privatize.

Aside from the felons mucking up the works, the mad rush to privatize prisons, utilities, freeways, computer systems and chunks of public education has become so entangled with lobbyists and campaign contributions and donors to political slush funds that it’s tough to discern the sensible deals from low-down giveaways of public assets.

Broward Commissioner Kristin Jacobs told me last week that she was worried that the privatization push was behind a state law, just signed by the governor, “that passed under the radar. Nobody in the Florida Association of Counties knew it was coming.” She said the new law weakens open-records requirements tied to the bidding process and extends “the veil of secrecy” over so-called confidential information in the winning bids. Amid this privatization frenzy, as cash-strapped governments dole out public assets to private companies, she worried that the law was concocted to obscure sweetheart deals until they become... well... done deals.

Most of what this first-ever privatization conference broached sounded like sensible solutions to the brutal economics crippling state and local government. The speakers just avoided discussing the scary aspect of privatization — how to keep public assets from getting gobbled up, for below fair-market prices, by Florida’s political bag men. They’re pretending not to see the unseemly potential of putting public institutions up for sale. They didn’t mention the influence peddlers who’ve co-opted so much of state and city and county government.

Come the second privatization conference, maybe we’ll see signs demanding, “Stop the War on Taxpayers.”

Out of control: TSA asks 95 yr old to remove adult diaper for patdown

Details
News
Link to article here.

Texas lawmakers need to pass the ban on TSA's groping patdowns as a condition of travel NOW!

Elderly woman asked to remove adult diaper during TSA search

LAUREN SAGE REINLIE / Florida Freedom Newspapers
2011-06-25 12:41:37

A woman has filed a complaint with federal authorities over how her elderly mother was treated
at Northwest Florida Regional Airport last weekend.

Jean Weber of Destin filed a complaint with the Department of Homeland Security after her 95-year-old mother was detained and extensively searched last Saturday while trying to board a plane to fly to Michigan to be with family members during the final stages of her battle with leukemia.

Her mother, who was in a wheelchair, was asked to remove an adult diaper in order to complete a pat-down search.

“It’s something I couldn’t imagine happening on American soil,” Weber said Friday. “Here is my mother, 95 years old, 105 pounds, barely able to stand, and then this.”

Sari Koshetz, a spokeswoman for the Transportation Security Administration in Miami, said she could not comment on specific cases to protect the privacy of those involved.
“The TSA works with passengers to resolve any security alarms in a respectful and sensitive manner,” she said.

Weber’s mother entered the airport’s security checkpoint in a wheelchair because she was not stable enough to walk through, Weber said.

Wheelchairs trigger certain protocols, including pat-downs and possible swabbing for explosives, Koshetz said.

“During any part of the process, if there is an alarm, then we have to resolve that alarm,” she said.

Weber said she did not know whether her mother had triggered an alarm during the 45 minutes they were detained.

She said her mother was first pulled aside into a glass-partitioned area and patted down. Then she was taken to another room to protect her privacy during a more extensive search, Weber said.

Weber said she sat outside the room during the search.

She said security personnel then came out and told her they would need for her mother to remove her Depends diaper because it was soiled and was impeding their search.

Weber wheeled her mother into a bathroom, removed her diaper and returned. Her mother did not have another clean diaper with her, Weber said.

Weber said she wished there were less invasive search methods for an elderly person who is unable to walk through security gates.

“I don’t understand why they have to put them through that kind of procedure,” she said.

Koshetz said the procedures are the same for everyone to ensure national security.

“TSA cannot exempt any group from screening because we know from intelligence that there are terrorists out there that would then exploit that vulnerability,” she said.

Weber filed a complaint through Northwest Florida Regional’s website. She said she received a response from a Homeland Security representative at the airport on Tuesday and spoke to that person on the phone Wednesday.

The representative told her that personnel had followed procedures during the search, Weber said.

“Then I thought, if you’re just following rules and regulations, then the rules and regulations need to be changed,” she said.

Weber said she plans to file additional complaints next week.

“I’m not one to make waves, but dadgummit, this is wrong. People need to know. Next time it could be you."

GA toll road paid for, but 'new toll' commences

Details
News
Link to article here.

As we've warned for years, the tolls will NEVER come off the roads once you start to go down this path. Politicians and bureaucrats, especially the toll authorities whose jobs depend on emptying your wallet to fill theirs, will ALWAYS find an excuse to continue tolls once a road is paid for....maintenance, rehabilitation, capital improvements, even other projects altogether.

Out with the old toll, in with the new toll

By David Tanner, Land Line associate editor

Landline Magazine, June 24, 2011

More than 20 years ago, Georgia leaders promised that tolls would come off the GA 400 in Atlanta once the roadway was paid off. Well, the roadway is paid off, but drivers will still pay a toll there for at least another 10 years. So what happened?

It’s an age-old trick.

Last year, with the end of tolls approaching, officials with the State Road & Tollway Authority launched a campaign saying they didn’t have enough money to make future improvements to the roadway. If only they could collect tolls for another decade, they could complete a laundry list of capital improvements.

That campaign led to then Gov. Sonny Perdue performing a little sleight of hand. Perdue stood on a soapbox and declared that the toll would come off as promised and that the government had fulfilled its commitment to the taxpayers. But then, just as quickly, the governor declared that a “new toll” would begin almost immediately, and last 10 years. It would not be the same toll, it would be new, he said.

The big switcheroo is happening this week. The “old toll” technically ends at 8 p.m., Friday, June 24, and highway users will get a solitary toll-free week of reprieve before the “new toll” begins.

Highway users including truckers demand that tolls be taken off once a roadway is paid for. It’s something governments promise for many projects but can rarely deliver, it seems.

There’s more to the Georgia story, and again it’s something that sticks in the craw of highway users.

Prior to Perdue’s term, former Gov. Roy Barnes signed a law to OK the diversion of some GA 400 revenue to other projects. Upon taking office, Perdue was presented with legislation aimed at ending the diversion, but he stamped a veto on it.

Georgia’s current governor, Nathan Deal, who took the reins in January, campaigned on a promise that if elected, he would “swing the sledgehammer” and put an end to the GA 400 toll before the end of his first year in office.

A spokeswoman for the governor had not returned a comment as of this posting.

Indiana toll operator going bankrupt

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Link to article here.

This is what privatizing our public roads reaps:

"Tolls for cars driving the length of the road are now $8.80 as compared to $4.65 when the lease was signed. Tolls for large semitrailer trucks are now $35.20, as compared to $18 when the lease was signed."

Then here's a Letter to the Editor that appeared in the Las Vegas Review Journal, June 25, 2011:

Road worries

To the editor:

State Sen. Joe Hardy's legislation allowing a toll road around Boulder City may lead to a perilous path.

Indiana sold its portion of a federal highway to bankers. The contract the governor signed is for 75 years. That contract prevents Indiana from improving any roads near the toll road or having high-speed rail service. Indiana must reimburse the investors for loss of tolls due to floods, etc., and the state must maintain the toll road.

Today, the tolls have increased obscenely and will continue to increase. Is this the future of Boulder City?

The Nevada Department of Transportation will not be allowed to maintain U.S. Highway 93/95, or Nevada Way, which is the main thoroughfare through Boulder City, if the contract with investors is similar to Indiana's.

I feel that any contract with investors should be approved by the voters of Clark County to safeguard our rights.

MAUREEN FAHLBERG

BOULDER CITY

_______________________________________________________________________
Report: Indiana Toll Road operator may default

By Keith Benman This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., (219) 933-3326 | Posted: Saturday, June 25, 2011 12:00 am

Motorists drive under i-Zoom signs near the Indiana Toll Road Portage exit. Toll Road operator ITR Concession Co. could be in danger of defaulting on its huge debt by early next year, according to a report. Also, tolls are scheduled for another increase Friday.

The private operator of the Indiana Toll Road could be in danger of defaulting on its huge debt by early next year, according to a report on the news wire service Debtwire.

The May report in Debtwire, a Financial Times Group publication, stated Toll Road operator ITR Concession Co. is rapidly burning through an interest reserve account, which much be maintained to keep $4.1 billion in loans in good standing.

Indiana Finance Authority Chairman Christopher Ruhl, in an email to The Times, stated that even in case of default and foreclosure, no taxpayer money is at stake, as the state has received the full $3.8 billion lease payment in June 2006.

He noted the lender would need the state's approval to transfer control of the Toll Road to any new private consortium or operator that may step in.

Tolls headed up

Tolls on the Indiana Toll Road make their annual increase Friday. Cars and motorcycles with i-Zoom or other electronic transponders will continue to receive a state-sponsored discount and see no increase. Tolls on the barrier system in Northwest Indiana also will not increase. Listed are some of the new tolls for driving the length of the road followed by the current tolls:

Cars and motorcycles: $9/$8.80

Car with trailer or small box truck: $11.50/$11.10

Semitrailer truck: $36.20/$35.20

"We've known since 2006 that the $3.8 billion lease payment was financed primarily through debt, that the debt came due in 2015 and that the amount of debt could place a significant burden on the capital structure of the concessionaire," Ruhl wrote.

The apparent financial difficulties have come about despite dramatic hikes in tolls since the 157-mile road was leased to a private consortium backed by Spain-based conglomerate Cintra and Australia-based Macquarie in June 2006.

Tolls for cars driving the length of the road are now $8.80 as compared to $4.65 when the lease was signed. Tolls for large semitrailer trucks are now $35.20, as compared to $18 when the lease was signed. Tolls are scheduled for another increase July 1.

According to the Debtwire article, the lending group for the Toll Road privatization is led by Royal Bank of Scotland, which has now assigned the troubled investment to its workout group to see if a financing solution can be found.

An interest reserve account of $150 million was established at the time the Toll Road lease deal was financed, but that has now dwindled to between $40 million and $50 million and could be depleted by year end, sources told Debtwire.

Royal Bank of Scotland did not respond to a Times' request for comment.

Cintra responded directly to questions on the status of the interest reserve account with an e-mailed statement that read in part: "The reserve account was initially created exactly for the intended financial gaps that occur over long time periods of operations. That is expected during economic cycles. Naturally it's going to be accessed and utilized on occasion, which is a continued sign of fulfilling its intended use."

A Macquarie representative said there has been no default on ITR Concession's debt, and no default is expected.

Ruhl stated the Indiana Finance Authority has been aware that interest expense has exceeded gross Toll Road revenue for years. He said that was "not a surprise" given the amount the private consortium borrowed to pay for the lease.

The lease agreement provides that the road returns to state control if any successive owner does not adhere to its operating standards. That owner could be a bank, hedge fund or consortium much like the current one.

As early as December 2009, ITR Concession Co. CEO Fernando Redondo told The Times traffic revenue for the Toll Road were not what the company had hoped it would be. He attributed the shortfall to lower than expected traffic levels during the recession and he expressed confidence revenue would recover.

Cintra parent company Ferrovial's annual report for 2010 shows traffic on the Toll Road in Northwest Indiana, its most heavily traveled section, was down 6.5 percent for the year. On the rest of the Toll Road traffic was up 2.7 percent.

However, a 10 percent toll boost in June 2010 helped pump up Toll Road revenues, with earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITA) increasing to $155.9 million, a 15.9 percent increase as compared to the year before.

The Indiana Toll Road Oversight Committee is aware of the possible financial difficulties at ITR Concession, said former Indiana Toll Road Executive Director Leigh Morris, who is now vice chairman of the oversight committee.

Morris said the lease between the Indiana Finance Authority and ITR Concession signed in 2006 contains more than adequate safeguards.

"It ensures continuity of the operation of the Toll Road and for the protection of the asset," Morris said.

Straus torpedoes TSA anti-groping bill

Details
News
Link to article here.

It's not a "stunt" to protect Texans, especially our children, from the groping of our sexual organs as a requirement for air travel. What next? Full body cavity searches when the next terrorist brings in a weapon in his body cavity? Texans have drawn a line in the sand, and no "resolution" requesting better treatment nor legislators going AWOL is acceptable. It's abundantly clear the 110 co-signers of this bill in the House didn't  mean it when they failed to show-up to pass it Friday.

Call Speaker Straus and your Texas lawmakers at (512) 463-4630 to tell them this isn't political theater or a mere request, DO NOT BACK DOWN or wimp out, we expect our lawmakers to ensure our 4th amendment rights are protected. Pass the anti-groping bill NOW!

Straus Calls TSA Bill "Publicity Stunt"

By Becca Aaronson
June 24, 2011
Texas Tribune

Updated 3:40 p.m.: Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst issued a statement this afternoon saying the Senate will try to pass its version of the bill out of committee on Monday. Dewhurst also said he is working with the Attorney General "to address several issues that were raised when the bill first came up for a vote in the Texas Senate."

Although the full text is not yet available online, 20 House members (not including Straus) authored a resolution "urging Congress to take appropriate action to ensure acceptable treatment of the public by personnel of the Transportation Security Administration." It was filed and referred to the State Affairs Committee post-adjournment today.

Original story: The TSA anti-groping bill hit another roadblock when the House adjourned today without considering the legislation as scheduled. “Our plane was not full to capacity,” House Speaker Joe Straus said, hinting that the House did not have a quorum present to pass the legislation. But that wasn't the only reason the bill wasn't heard.

 “The bill, without some serious revisions, appears to me to be nothing more than an ill-advised publicity stunt, unenforceable…[and] misdirected at uniform security personnel,” Straus said. He argued the bill should be aimed “at Washington, at the bosses of these people."

The bill would criminalize "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly touching" the "sexual organs" of someone during a security screening at a public facility, including airports. Although it passed unanimously out of the House during the regular session, the bill died in the Senate after the Department of Justice threatened to shut down Texas airports if the legislation passed. In a letter to Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and House Speaker Joe Straus, U.S. Attorney John E. Murphy said the federal government would be forced to cancel flights in Texas if TSA could not effectively screen passengers to ensure the safety of all flights.

The Longview Republican who authored the bill, David Simpson, said he’s not surprised the bill was not considered today. Straus approached Simpson earlier this week and asked him to change the language of the bill. “The first thing I was asked to do was remove the section that refers to private parts,” said Simpson. He was also asked to reduce the standard for searching people in the bill from “probable cause” to “reasonable suspicion.” Simpson did not agree to change the language, but said he would have accepted an amendment, if it was supported by the House, to change the language in the bill.

Today, Straus — showing a degree of public adamance not seen much this session — said the bill will never be considered on the House floor "as written." The House is drafting a resolution to send a message to the appropriate people and address the issue of inappropriate searches “without making the Texas Legislature a laughing stock," he said.

The TSA groping bill is the latest item to be added to the special session call. Gov. Rick Perry originally stated the bill did not have enough support to warrant a second chance. His thoughts were captured and published on YouTube while he was at a book signing in New Orleans. Perry added the bill to the call last week, on the same day Simpson sent him a letter stating that the bill had enough support to pass out of both chambers.

“The only thing I’ve seen from the governor was on YouTube,” said Straus, who said he hasn’t received any guidance from the governor on whether or not to pass the legislation.

The special session ends Wednesday, and with the recent setback, it is unlikely the bill will be approved by both chambers in time to pass. A committee hearing to consider an identical version of the bill filed by Sen. Dan Patrick, R-Houston, was cancelled on Thursday, June 23.

The Insanity of Sustainable Development

Details
News
Link to article here.

NOTE: Sustainable development and Agenda 21 are being implemented in transportation policy as well through public private partnerships (PPPs). In the 82nd regular session of the Texas Legislature, not only did PPPs get re-authorized, HB 1105/SB 513 (which failed to pass) attempted to force TxDOT to adopt a "complete streets" policy that would have mandated 20% of the cost of a highway project go to curbs, sidewalks, "context solutions" (expensive, artsy, site specific ornamentation or landscaping), and/or accommodating bicycles, often at the expense of auto capacity (which has resulted in the removal of auto lanes and dedicating them to bicycles only in San Antonio already).

The Insanity of Sustainable Development
By Cathie Adams
International Issues Chair
Eagle Forum
June 20, 2011

Physicist Albert Einstein said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. That is exactly what the United Nations is doing with "sustainable development," which insists that economic, environmental and social equity or "justice" will produce health, peace and prosperity. The UN incorporates it in policies and treaties that target every nation, prodding them to conform to the same Marxist ideals that failed miserably in the 70-year experiment in the former U.S.S.R.
The UN has given special emphasis to the implementation of sustainable development in Africa, passing a resolution each year since 1998 entitled the "Causes of Conflict and the Promotion of Durable Peace and Sustainable Development in Africa." With devastating results today 67% of the world's HIV/AIDS cases are in Africa, as are 90% of the cases of malaria, while 33% of its population suffers from malnutrition, and 15 wars rage on the continent.

Pushing for more foreign aid is key to the UN's sustainable development agenda, but two prominent Africans believe the funding has hurt, rather than helped the African people. Andrew Mwenda, editor of Uganda's Independent newspaper, and Kofi Bentil, lecturer at University of Ghana, have concluded that foreign aid has "stunted growth and subsidized bad governance in Africa. . . . adding that the weight of regulations, bad laws and stifling bureaucracy, subsidized by five decades of development aid, prevents Africans from lifting themselves out of poverty".

Media mogul Ted Turner's billion dollar gift to the UN gives him a billion reasons to advocate for the UN and its sustainable development. Playing on American generosity, while hiding UN failures, Turner's UN Foundation president Timothy Wirth cited the UN's "frontline work" in Sudan and Libya as the reason why 85% of Americans support the UN in their recent poll. But the truth is that the UN has failed in both countries.
Since 1955, ten years after the UN's founding, civil wars have ravaged Sudan. In 2005, the UN Security Council referred the desperate situation in the Sudanese city of Darfur to the International Criminal Court. The ICC issued arrest warrants against its president, yet he remains in office, while about 100,000 persons have suffered the losses of their homes and jobs. Admitting its utter failure, the UN complains that the Sudanese president "continues denying the crimes, attributing them to other factors (such as inter-tribal clashes), diverting attention by publicizing ceasefire agreements that are violated as soon as they are announced, and finally proposing the creation of special courts to conduct investigations that will never start."

Admitting failure also in Libya, the UN states that "the international community" has let Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi "literally get away with murder" for the past 42 years. Since February, an estimated 10-15,000 people have been killed in battle, another 1,200 drowned attempting to flee by sea, and millions suffer from severe food shortages. Meanwhile, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) has extended its air war for another 90 days, as Gadhafi wages a ground war giving Viagra-like medications to his troops targeting his political opponents for rape.

The UN's international tribunals cost about $300 million annually, but have few results to show taxpayers. The UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda held its first trial in 1997 for the 1994 Rwandan genocide of 800,000 Tutsis. Since then 50 trials have been held that convicted 29. Eleven more trials are in progress, with 14 individuals awaiting trials, while 13 accused are still at large. Rather than the UN Security Council shutting down the grossly inept tribunal, in 2014 it will transfer its work to a new International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals.

Since its inception, the UN has failed its first mission to resolve conflicts and avert wars, and its courts and tribunals cannot even bring the bad guys to justice. Its emphasis on sustainable development in Africa has failed to bring peace or health or prosperity; yet, it continues to prod every nation to adopt its Marxist ideals. "We the people" are looking for a presidential candidate in the 2012 with the courage to stop this insanity.

Durbin: Tread carefully before selling public assets

Details
Public Private Partnerships

Link to article here.

Durbin gets it. However, his bill needs to go farther. His bill still allows governments to enter into public private partnerships -- the only "protection" is disclosure of the terms and an insurance policy that the feds get their money back. That, however, isn't much protection for the actual taxpayers being asked to pay the daily toll taxes plus the profits of a foreign company in these government-sanctioned monopolies over our PUBLIC infrastructure.

Tread carefully before selling public assets

Federal taxpayers must be protected

By Dick Durbin

Special contributor to the Chicago Tribune

7:06 PM CDT, June 23, 2011

 
 

We all know the story of Chicago's parking meters — for a one-time payment of $1.15 billion, we turned over control of a public asset to a private investor. But now, only two years into a 75-year lease, that money is almost gone and the costs just keep going up for Chicagoans and visitors.

From parking meters to airports, public assets around the country are now seen as "cash cows" that can be sold or leased by cash-strapped state and local governments for a one-time payment.

Having billions of dollars immediately available to plug budget holes without raising taxes is very appealing. And to the delight of Wall Street investors, state and local governments often fail to ask the important questions or consider the long-term impact.

In 2006, Indiana struck a deal with foreign investors to lease the 157-mile Indiana Toll Road for 75 years in exchange for a one-time payment of $3.8 billion. Under the deal, the investors own the right to collect tolls, which they plan to increase in the coming weeks. For truckers that fee will rise to $36.20 from $35.20.

Is it surprising when foreign investors — with no stake in the road other than their interest in turning a profit — continue to raise tolls?

Whether you agree or disagree with privatization, two things are obvious. First, taxpayers need to be asking more and better questions before handing over control of critical public assets like a highway, an airport or a parking meter concession. And second, Uncle Sam is being played for a sucker.

In Washington we're broke, so for every dollar we spend, we borrow 40 cents from China, Saudi Arabia and others. We then give these borrowed funds to state and local governments because they can't afford to build highways and airports on their own. Now many of these same governments are selling and leasing these assets without any payback to the federal government.

It is time for the federal taxpayers to have a seat at the table and a return on their investment in these projects. Taxpayers across the U.S. have invested hundreds of billions of dollars building our nation's infrastructure and that investment should be protected.

Last week, I introduced legislation that would require state and local governments to take a hard look at the impact these deals are having on the federal taxpayer and the people that use these transportation assets. The Protecting Taxpayers in Transportation Asset Transfers Act would require full disclosure of the terms and conditions of any privatization of an asset that was built with federal tax dollars.

The bill would attach a lien to existing federally funded major transportation projects that have received more than $25 million in federal funding or have a value over $500 million. The lien would only be removed after state and local governments repay the depreciated value of federal funds used to build and maintain the asset.

Instead of incentivizing quick, short-term decisions, the federal government should be asking the tough questions when governments turn over publicly funded transportation assets to for-profit operators. This legislation will make sure those questions are answered before we sell our public assets.

U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., is the assistant Senate majority l

Glenn Beck tackles Agenda 21 that seeks to privatize public roads

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Finally a member of the mainstream press is uncovering Agenda 21 and the sustainable development policies. Agenda 21's stated goals are to abolish private property and restrict mobility in individual cars (ie - herd people into the cities and make them dependent on mass transit). Public private partnerships are a primary means to accomplish these goals, which is the sale of our public roads to private, even foreign corporations which not only mean toll rates as high as 75-80 cents PER MILE, it also restricts the expansion of free lanes and allows the government to abuse its eminent domain powers to steal your land and give it to another private interest for profit.

Check out Beck's expose' on YouTube here. Here's an example of the sort of propaganda sustainable development proponents produce in order to make it "cool" and "green" to give up your property rights and freedom to travel. Watch it on YouTube here.

Lawmaker wants to privatize transit

Details
Public Private Partnerships
Link to article here.

So politicians in all their wisdom want to spread a system that's already NOT working, privatization of our public roads & parking meters, to another mode of transportation, mass transit, a mode already plagued by the need for massive public subsidies that has never been able to pay for itself with users alone. The famous Chicago parking meter boondoggle caused parking rates to go from $1/hour to $5/hour. A huge bump is also true of toll rates when public roads are privatized. So who's making out on the deal? Not the taxpayer. It's fiscally irresponsible governments willing to put taxpayers in hawk for generations to get quick cash to solve today's budget problems, rather than restrain spending to match revenue.

Kirk unveils plan to ease transit privatization

By Jon Hilkevitch

Chicago Tribune

11:14 AM CDT, June 20, 2011

 
Republican Mark Kirk today unveiled a plan designed to make it easier for governments to lease public transportation assets or enter into partnerships with private companies to build them.

In presenting the details of his--which runs counter to proposed legislation from Sen. Dick Durbin--said the plan could produce $100 billion for public-private partnerships on highway, mass transit, aviation and rail projects.

"Our roads, rail, transit and airports are facing unprecedented funding shortfalls,” he said.  “We should not further burden working families with higher gas taxes.  Instead, we should look to our own economic history to find a solution.”

The measure would "eliminate barriers for innovative funding options,'' he said. Joining Kirk at the announcement at the Union League Club were U.S. Reps. Randy Hultgren, a Winfield Republican, and Dan Lipinski, a Democrat from Western Springs.

The legislation, called the Lincoln Legacy Infrastructure Development Act, would remove federal restrictions on public-private partnerships while requiring that the proceeds of leases or sales be reinvested in infrastructure, Kirk said.

The initiative to loosen the reins on privatization, coming at a time of record federal and state deficits and the prospect of declining government spending on public infrastructure, runs counter to legislation that Democrat Durbin introduced Friday.

It also follows controversial privatization deals in Chicago, including former Mayor Richard Daley's long-term leases of the Chicago Skyway and the city's parking meters. Daley also approved an agreement, which subsequently fell apart, to lease Midway Airport.

Durbin's focus is to protect taxpayer dollars that are used on state and local projects involved in a privatization deal. His proposed legislation, The Protecting Taxpayers in Transportation Asset Transfers Act, would require public involvement before major transportation projects could be leased or sold, he said.

Durbin said he is not opposed to privatization. "But as the private financiers take control of an airport, road or other transportation asset for decades, sometimes as long as 99 years, the federal taxpayer is often left holding the bag,'' Durbin said.

In the case of the Skyway and Midway, the city spent hundreds of millions of dollars rebuilding both the elevated toll road to Indiana and the Southwest Side airport before putting them on the block.

Chicago business owners and residents led by Little Village community activist Raul Montes Jr. called Sunday on Mayor Rahm Emanuel to end the city's lease of the tollway.

"It's an infamous deal," Montes, 36, said. "When we sell Chicago's assets to alleviate budget concerns, it's pretty much fiscally irresponsible."

The city sold the rights to the Skyway in 2005 for $1.83 billion for a 99-year lease. The roadway now costs $3.50 to travel.

The city's contract with Skyway Concession Company LLC is legally binding. Ending the lease early would likely be extraordinarily expensive, if possible at all.

The parking meter deal also has caused public anger over hefty increases in parking rates, the private operator's initial mismanagement of the system and criticism that the city should have received more money for the 75-year lease.

Any deal to sell or lease public assets should include a return on the federal taxpayer investment, Durbin said.

Borrowing spree by TX lawmakers to benefit private investors

Details
News
Link to article here.

The fact some of this borrowed money that ALL Texas taxpayers are obligated to pay back will be used to subsidize toll projects is an outrageous abuse of taxpayers and a DOUBLE TAX! If a toll project can't pay for itself through the toll users, then it shouldn't be built as a toll road. That's the legacy of Rick Perry and many in the Texas legislature -- DOUBLE TAX, punitive taxation to benefit private bond investors and global toll operators, not using the tax money we all pay to provide public roads for the benefit of ALL Texans. TURF and grassroots Texans worked hard to prevent the first round of Prop 12 going to prop-up toll projects....a DOUBLE TAX. Now a handful of conferees added a rider to the budget authorizing $3 billion more in Prop 12 road debt (already $31 BILLION in the hole for road debt and the LBB already warned we can't borrow any more money, we've maxed out the credit card), and they alone decided how this money would be distributed around the state.

The 183 toll project in Irving is a slush fund for private corporations seeking to become the state's toll collector and sole beneficiary of public funds for its private profits for the next HALF CENTURY! Perry and his cronies want to privatize that public road, using TAX MONEY. The article states they "hope to attract private investors" to add toll lanes to 183...only a fool would turn down "free" money to subsidize their profits. Won't be hard to "attract" charlatans given the sweetheart deal Texas lawmakers and Perry are oh so willing to hand out. It's an eminent domain abuse for private gain, and these public 'assets' aren't for Perry nor any politician to give away!

$3 billion borrowing spree approved by Texas Legislature will help pay for downtown Dallas bridges

By MICHAEL A. LINDENBERGER
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  07 June 2011


Funding for two new bridges over the Trinity River is on its way to Dallas, thanks mainly to a $3 billion borrowing spree approved by the 2011 Legislature.

The new bridges, which will replace aging spans on Interstates 35E and 30, are the remaining components of what was once hoped to be a trio of signature bridges over the Trinity designed by Santiago Calatrava, whose first Dallas effort — the Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge — is under construction.

The Legislature agreed to issue the $3 billion in new bonds rather than see nearly all new highway construction stop in 2012, as state transportation officials warned would happen without new revenue.

The new debt was a substitute for new taxes, and lawmakers directed that $500 million of the bonds be spent on nine bridges throughout the state.

Most of the bridge money — about $320 million — will come to Dallas, where design work is under way for a new I-30 span known as the Margaret McDermott Bridge. A second bridge along with substantial new ramps and other connectors, would replace the existing I-35E bridge and could be under construction within a few years, officials said. A third, smaller Dallas bridge east of downtown near Deep Ellum, will also be replaced, thanks to the new money.

The I-30 and I-35E bridges could be built together, in stages, said Jahnae Stout, spokeswoman for the North Central Texas Council of Governments. Construction on the I-30 component could begin as soon as next summer.

The second component, which would include the I-35E bridge and a complex network of new ramps and connections, could begin in 2014 at the earliest. It awaits approval by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

But solving the funding puzzles makes everything else much easier to address, officials said.

“This is good news,” said Michael Morris, staff director of the Regional Transportation Council, which voted last week to funnel most of North Texas’ share of the $3 billion in bonds statewide to Dallas County.

North Texas will receive another $535 million from the remaining $2.5 billion in bond proceeds, too. Together with money set aside from other sources, including the North Texas Tollway Authority, these new funds will cover nearly all of the remaining costs for the bridges and make other local highway improvements.

In Irving, for instance, the money will mean $100 million for a toll project on State Highway 183, where state officials hope to attract private investors to add paid HOV lanes.

For Dallas County

Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins said he and other east-side representatives on the Regional Transportation Council scored an important victory last week when they convinced their counterparts from Tarrant and other western counties to send most of the new money to Dallas County and, to a smaller degree, Collin County.

Of the $855 million share of the bond money that will come to North Texas, all but $160 million will be spent on the east side of the region, with most of the money staying in the city of Dallas.

The wrestling over funding, however, likely will continue. Experts routinely predict that state and federal gas tax receipts — the traditional way roads are funded in Texas and elsewhere — cannot keep up with the costs of maintaining the aging interstate system and fighting congestion in America’s biggest cities.

That funding shortage has led lawmakers across the country to consider heavier reliance on private investors to help pay for big toll roads. Texas has led the way on that path, but paused two years ago when lawmakers allowed the state’s authority to enter private toll deals to expire.

Legislation awaits Gov. Rick Perry’s signature that restores authority to use private financing to deliver seven major highway projects throughout Texas. If he signs the bill as expected, private toll firms could compete for three new toll projects in North Texas.

The first to be shopped to potential investors is the massive reconstruction of Interstate 35E from Dallas to Denton. Like the other two — the Highway 183 project and the expansion of the North Tarrant Express — the new I-35E would be a mix of tolled lanes and rebuilt free lanes.

Dallas bridges

But by far, the most immediate impact of the funding decisions in recent weeks will be seen in downtown Dallas, across the star-crossed Trinity River.

City officials have long considered the three proposed signatures spans by Calatrava as a dazzling way to elevate Dallas’ skyline to world-class status.

With the new money from Texas Department of Transportation mixing with nearly $500 million expected to be paid by the North Texas Tollway Authority, the region can make good on the vision of three new bridges.

Calatrava’s involvement will be less than initially hoped, however. Only the Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge will be fully designed by the Spanish architect.

He’s likely to play a role in designing part of the I-30 bridge, though probably only the spans that will carry the frontage roads.

The third bridge, over Interstate 35E, must still clear standard federal environmental hurdles and is expected to be designed without input from Calatrava, Morris said.

$855 million

$3 billion

Bond money approved by lawmakers in 2011, completing a bond program initially authorized by voters in 2007

$855 million

Total amount North Texas received for new construction from the $3 billion program

$500 million

Amount set aside for work on nine bridges statewide

$320 million

Amount of bridge money earmarked for Dallas, where three new spans will be funded, including two over the Trinity River

Phillips makes 'Worst Legislators' List

Details
News
We couldn't agree more with Texas Monthly's assessment of House Transportation Chair Larry Phillips in its 'Best and Worst Legislators of 2011' List. Phillips authored some of the WORST, most anti-private property rights, anti-taxpayer, toxic debt ridden bills of the session. Click here and here to read more about it.

The Best & Worst Legislators 2011
Texas Monthly
By Nat Blakeslee and Paul Burka
July 2011

EXCERPT on Larry Phillips:

LARRY PHILLIPS R–Sherman


Taking a 'breather'... Photo: JERRY LARA / This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

"A legislative accident waiting for a place to happen. Larry Phillips desperately wants to be a respected player in the big game, but even after five sessions, he has yet to figure out that respect can’t be manipulated; it has to be earned. His first impulse in any situation is to try to demonstrate that he’s a big shot, which is a sure sign that he isn’t. He got off to a bad start last fall, becoming embroiled in controversy concerning perceived threats made on behalf of the incumbent Joe Straus during the Speaker’s race. Phillips denied involvement, and a probe by the House General Investigating and Ethics Committee proved inconclusive, but the episode still hung like a cloud over the beginning of the session.

Meanwhile, Phillips was busy doing the sorts of things that win you a nomination for the Worst list: heckling colleagues from his perch near the back mike with witticisms like “You’re wrong!” Or tacking bad amendments onto innocent bills. We see a glimmer of hope in Phillips. He has talent and moxie. The missing ingredient is work ethic. Somewhere along the line, he appears to have come to the conclusion that because he is a committee chairman (Transportation), he doesn’t have to do his homework and he doesn’t have to be able to give a clear description of what his bills do. Consequently, members don’t trust him. This was evident during debate on the TxDOT sunset bill, when he painfully tried to explain why his proposal to expand the role of the state infrastructure bank was a good idea. At the very least, he should have been aware that many members are suspicious of anything TxDOT wants. The only way to succeed was to make a strong case for the bank, but his inability to articulate the policy issues doomed his efforts. A slow learner, he tried to tack an amendment onto an unrelated bill to help deer breeders, despite a previous agreement by stakeholders to forgo changes to the bill. He failed again. The lesson is straight from the Boy Scouts: Be prepared."

View the full list here.

Subcategories

Eminent Domain

Trans Texas Corridor

Public Private Partnerships

Regional Mobility Authority

Metropolitan Planning Organization

Climate Policy

Video

Page 57 of 103
  • Start
  • Prev
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • Next
  • End

Latest News

  • Costly and Glitchy: A Taxpayer-Funded Electric Vehicle Odyssey
  • Paxton sues more companies for illegally harvesting, selling driver data
  • NYC imposes congestion tolls on cars to pay for transit upgrades
  • NYC congestion tolling unleashes congestion nightmare
  • Still waiting: Families, victims await justice for I-35 pileup in 2021
  • Broken promise: Leaders promised to remove tolls in Harris County once roads paid for
  • Watch Fox-TV Houston panelists sound off on SH 288 double taxation
  • Incoming House members ask Abbott's Commission to declare end date on SH 288 tolls

Latest Press Releases

  • TxDOT awash in cash, $15 billion richer
  • TURF bill to prevent remote kill switches in cars gets filed
  • Grassroots groups sue state of Texas over Prop 2 illegal ballot
  • 'No on Prop 2' campaign steps up opposition to property tax increases
  • Grassroots groups hail Abbott's non-toll plan for I-35 expansion through Austin
  • Stop tolls, criminal penalties during coronavirus
  • BIG Fat 'F': Majority of state lawmakers earn failing grade
  • Krause bill undermines Governor's 'No toll' pledge, renews private toll contracts
Truth Be Tolled :: Voices will be heard
Texans for Toll-Free Highways
TURF - Defending Our Property Rights and Freedom to Travel

© 2006-2023 All Rights Reserved.  Texans United for Reform & Freedom

FAIR USE NOTICE. This site may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. TexasTURF.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial, non-profit, effort to advance the understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a "fair use" of the copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.TexasTURF.org  does not express or imply that TexasTURF.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as may appear on this page.
Bootstrap is a front-end framework of Twitter, Inc. Code licensed under MIT License. Font Awesome font licensed under SIL OFL 1.1.